is mac walters the reason mass effect 3 was so bad

Mass Relays Preserved by choosing Destroy (if you have a high EMS) This was supposed to be where everything you did throughout the past three games comes together in the end and show all your progress and good choices in an epilogue, and if you survive and one of the endings should have had to have an ending where the Mass Relays were preserved. I'm okay with people liking the endings, BUT FOR COME ON BIOWARE, THE TRUTH IS THAT IS ONLY ONE ENDING, AND FOR THOSE WHO 'understand' the 2deep4u context.īut some of us really would have preferred a choice in the matter, i mean- you could have a 'depressing' ending, a 'happy' ending, and a 'semi-depressing-semi-sad' ending.

Apparently they think we're too stupid to understand their 'Artistic Ending' That they're insulting us by keeping the ending they have, but only adding more so us who are too 'stupid' to understand it would- well understand it. all they're doing is adding more scenes to 'Clarify' the ending. Well apparently Bioware has decided to add a DLC to Remedy thatĪpparently, They aren't changing the endings. What happened to Shepard in the Destroy Ending (Good, Survive) Why was Joker flying the Normandy away from Earth and the Explosion How did the crew get back on the Normandy :::::::::::::::::::SPOILERS AHEAD:::::::::::::::::::įor those who really did not like the ending of Mass Effect 3 and felt that they left a lot out, a lot of explanations like: BUT AT LEAST I'M HONEST D (and i care about what you think, leave a comment below )

Edit: OOOPS hahaha my bad, i forgot to add a source.

Is mac walters the reason mass effect 3 was so bad